Tuesday 30 April 2013

How to tell if person is good or evil

Happy Dog
Mike Adams of naturlanews in article titled How to instantly tell who's evil vs. good: the philosophy of 'control' vs. 'empowerment'  shows in several examples how to tell good person from a bad one.  Of course his article relates to certain spectrum of good and evil but it definitely addresses properly the discussion on the highest level. His approach to determine if person is good or bad takes into account philosophy of 'control' vs. 'empowerment'.

The assumption is that those who seek control are bad and those who empower others are good.

One might say that empowering a criminal might not be necessarily a good action, yet empowering in itself doesn't mean give someone more power which can be used to destroy, but to give power which can be used to create. So in short empowering means to me giving somebody power to create more, while control is to suppress somebodies creative powers or support only those creative powers which can be used to control others.

Here are examples of controls vs empowerment from above article.

A person who seeks to teach others how to garden and thereby grow their own food is practicing empowerment and is therefore GOOD. But a person who seeks to place other people on government food stamps and thereby make them dependent on government for their food is practicing control and is inherently EVIL.

A school that teaches students to think for themselves and engage in critical, skeptical thinking about the world around them is practicing empowerment and is therefore GOOD. But a school that teaches students blind obedience to institutional authority while denying them the liberty to think for themselves is practicing control and is therefore EVIL.

A person who seeks to help others create their own successful businesses and generate abundant profits for themselves and their employees is practicing empowerment and is therefore GOOD. But a person who seeks to destroy entrepreneurship, suppress innovation, punish small businesses and burden private sector job creation with onerous taxes and regulation is practicing control and is therefore EVIL.

A person who seeks to teach others how to protect themselves against violent crime through the intelligent, ethical use of weapons for self defense is practicing empowerment and is therefore GOOD. But a person who seeks to strip away from everyone else their right to self defense, placing them in the position of defenseless victimization, is practicing control and is therefore EVIL.

A city mayor who seeks to teach his constituents the principles of nutrition and food choice so that they might make better decisions about their diet and health is practicing empowerment and is therefore GOOD. But a city mayor who demands blind obedience to his selective agenda of banning large sodas or other junk food items is practicing control and is therefore EVIL. (Bloomberg, anyone?)

So, getting back to the title of this article, the way to instantly tell whether a person is "good" or "evil" is to examine their actions on the control vs. empowerment spectrum. If they predominantly seek to control others, they are mostly evil. If they predominantly seek to empower others, they are mostly good.

Be careful to examine peoples' actions, not merely their words. Anyone can talk a good game of "empowerment," but very few actually seek to educate and uplift others around them.

Here are some more examples on my own.

An individual who uses criticism, smearing tactics, character assassination and links another with lowest denominator in hope that this person will be removed from society or punished is an example of an individual seeking control
A person who takes action themselves and shows how work should be done is the empowering person, because through actions he/she shows how it is possible to do things in a better way. He/she simply teaches by example.

Another one
A person using anonymous name and badmouthing others is a person seeking control because such a person is hoping to harm another individual and at the same time hide his/her own identity so he/she is not kept accountable for the harm caused. In short this individual is working in tandem with darkness. It is not just a controlling individual but person of darkness.

A person who is opening his/her own individual persona to the public is an empowering individual because such a person in spite of mistakes and errors he/she might be making is not afraid of facing criticisms and/or consequences. That kind of person is always able to face his/her own imperfections and accept the fact that everyone will know that. This kind of person shows that he/she is true to themselves in spite of what others might think.

Bogdan Fiedur

Enhanced by Zemanta

Sunday 28 April 2013

The Top Five Regrets of The Dying

Happiness Photo by Bogdan Fiedur
A palliative nurse Bronnie Ware recorded the most common regrets of the dying and put her findings into a book called ‘The Top Five Regrets of The Dying.’

I just have read those five reasons and realized that these are some of the things which parents don't want their children to do. Usually parents want their children to have education which gives them plenty of opportunities to find good and well paid job, good position in the society, good looking and rich spouses and to be successful where quite often success means high positions and good pay.

As parents we frequently forget that what we should give our children in first place is our support for their search to find their true calling, to support them when they are trying things which seem to be impossible to accomplish and when they want to do their own mistakes.

It is very likely that those regrets could have been avoided if these dying individuals were taught from the young age that life is more like a school where our main objective is to attain happiness. No amount of money or position will ever give one permanent happiness, as after one level, there is another one which needs to be conquered again and again. Hopefully one day, humanity reaches the point of understanding that living in cooperation is much more rewarding than living in competition.
Through cooperation we can understand that only what is being shared can be enjoyed and fully appreciated.

Here are the top 5 reasons from the book above. 

1. I wish I’d had the courage to live a life true to myself, not the life others expected of me.“This was the most common regret of all. When people realize that their life is almost over and look back clearly on it, it is easy to see how many dreams have gone unfulfilled. Most people had not honored even a half of their dreams and had to die knowing that it was due to choices they had made, or not made. Health brings a freedom very few realize, until they no longer have it.”
2. I wish I hadn't worked so hard.“This came from every male patient that I nursed. They missed their children’s youth and their partner’s companionship. Women also spoke of this regret, but as most were from an older generation, many of the female patients had not been breadwinners. All of the men I nursed deeply regretted spending so much of their lives on the treadmill of a work existence.”
3. I wish I’d had the courage to express my feelings.“Many people suppressed their feelings in order to keep peace with others. As a result, they settled for a mediocre existence and never became who they were truly capable of becoming. Many developed illnesses relating to the bitterness and resentment they carried as a result.”
4. I wish I had stayed in touch with my friends.“Often they would not truly realise the full benefits of old friends until their dying weeks and it was not always possible to track them down. Many had become so caught up in their own lives that they had let golden friendships slip by over the years. There were many deep regrets about not giving friendships the time and effort that they deserved. Everyone misses their friends when they are dying.”
5. I wish that I had let myself be happier. ”This is a surprisingly common one. Many did not realise until the end that happiness is a choice. They had stayed stuck in old patterns and habits. The so-called ‘comfort’ of familiarity overflowed into their emotions, as well as their physical lives. Fear of change had them pretending to others, and to their selves, that they were content, when deep within, they longed to laugh properly and have silliness in their life again.”
Source: http://www.amazon.co.uk/The-Top-Five-Regrets-Dying/dp/1848509995/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1367096226&sr=8-1&keywords=top+regrets+of+the+dying
Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday 18 April 2013

Top Stem Cell Biologist Says "The Genes Don’t Control Life”

An Arctic Fox Photo by Antosia Fiedur
According to Bruce Lipton, the genes do not control life but rather epigenetic (above the genes) factors associated with nutrition, environmental exposure and even belief and emotion. By changing the environment of the genes, and the way you perceive things, you can change your destiny.
Bruce is a cellular biologist who is the author of “The Biology Of Belief” and “Spontaneous Evolution”.

In the video below, Bruce talks about his life, his work, and how he sees the predicament of the human race.

In the interview on GreenMed TV, Lipton states that genetically identical stem cells will behave differently when placed in varying petri dish environments. Some will develop into bone cells and others into muscle. It all will depended on the specific chemical environment, not the genetic code. After realizing this he started questioning his current believes and established knowledge in the area of genetics and how this observation relates to human body.

Next he analyzed how the chemistry in the body is controlled by subconscious mind (about 95% of our thoughts are run by our subconscious which based on our thoughts will create different chemical reactions in our body). Simply any of our thoughts and perceptions initiates chemical reactions in our body. Different chemical reaction are triggered when we have positive thoughts than when we have negative thoughts. The first creates positive chemical sate of our body supporting bodily functions and health, wheres the second suppresses certain functions and if prolonged cause permanent damage to our body and lowers immunity. Since many if not most of our thoughts are unconscious and are result of years of programing started during early childhood (most first six years of our lives), we have difficult issue ahead of us. Whatever we learn during firs six years of our lives, controls us till the end, unless we reprogram ourselves.

The solution is to deprogram and direct our thinking towards positive domain. It doesn't matter if situation is positive or bad, all we need to do is to have a positive outlook in every case to keep our body functions at its best. This itself will provide us with energy, motivation and mysterious events will start happening in our lives due to positive environment we are creating. 

Deprogramming is a process which has to be very consistent. We need to watch our thoughts and behavior and correct it all the time, until we train ourselves to react and think in the most positive way in response to every situation. Seeing glass half full as opposed to half empty is a key.

You are the master and you can change your believes to positively affect your own environment.

More articles..




Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday 15 April 2013

Did evolution really happen or it is just a fairy tale for grownups?

Port Ligat (Venus with Drawers), 1970

In the book tilted The Source Field Investigations: The Hidden Science and Lost Civilizations
David Wilcock writes chapter on DNA and concept called spontaneous generation. 

He writes about Prof. Ignacio Pacheco who gathered ordinary sand found on the non-polluted beach and heated it to 1400 degrees C. It is believed that above this temperature any biological forms are destroyed.  Next sand was put into sterile environment and cooled off.  Finally sand was mixed with distilled water and poured into sterile test tube. Subsequently the tube has been sterilized two times with 24 hours between sterilizations to destroy all known spores and vegetative cells.
Taking tests and observing the tubes, Pacheco observed a verity of living structures appeared in the water which resembled complex living organisms, which were capable of growth and division. They were moving around the tube. Some of them looked like microscopic sea vegetables Gorgonia. You can find more about this here and here.

I'm including some images found on the above pages.

See more here..

In article Dust ‘Comes Alive’ In Space
Robert Booth

SCIENTISTS have discovered that inorganic material can take on the characteristics of living organisms in space, a development that could transform views of alien life.
An international panel from the Russian Academy of Sciences, the Max Planck institute in Germany and the University of Sydney found that galactic dust could form spontaneously into helixes and double helixes and that the inorganic creations had memory and the power to reproduce themselves.
A similar rethinking of prospective alien life is being undertaken by the National Research Council, an advisory body to the US government. It says Nasa should start a search for what it describes as “weird life” - organisms that lack DNA or other molecules found in life on Earth.
The new research, to be published this week in the New Journal of Physics, found nonorganic dust, when held in the form of plasma in zero gravity, formed the helical structures found in DNA. The particles are held together by electromagnetic forces that the scientists say could contain a code comparable to the genetic information held in organic matter. It appeared that this code could be transferred to the next generation.
Professor Greg Morfill, of the Max Planck institute of extra-terrestrial physics, said: “Going by our current narrow definitions of what life is, it qualifies.
“The question now is to see if it can evolve to become intelligent. It’s a little bit like science fiction at the moment. The potential level of complexity we are looking at is of an amoeba or a plant.
Following scientific paper further explains spontaneous creation of DNA like structure from non-organic material.
From plasma crystals and helical structures towards inorganic living matter

Since we can observe DNA like structures to be spontaneously created out of dust, sterilized sand and water, how does the evolution stack up against it?

Professor Louis Bonoure, Director of Research at the French National Center of Scientific Research, said "Evolutionism is a fairy tale for grown-ups. This theory has helped nothing in the progress of science. It is useless."

Two scientists Richard Muller and Robert Rohde have found that

Fossil Records Show Biodiversity Comes and Goes

BERKELEY, CA – A detailed and extensive new analysis of the fossil records of marine animals over the past 542 million years has yielded a stunning surprise. Biodiversity appears to rise and fall in mysterious cycles of 62 million years for which science has no satisfactory explanation. The analysis, performed by researchers with the U.S. Department of Energy's Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) and the University of California at Berkeley, has withstood thorough testing so that confidence in the results is above 99-percent.

“What we’re seeing is a real and very strong signal that the history of life on our planet has been shaped by a 62 million year cycle, but nothing in present evolutionary theory accounts for it,” said Richard Muller, a physicist who holds joint appointments with Berkeley Lab’s Physics Division, and UC Berkeley’s Physics Department. “While this signal has a huge presence in biodiversity, it can also be seen in both extinctions and originations.”
So far we know that DNA like structures can be created out of dust and sand.
That we have mysterious cycles of 62 million years where biodiversity appears out of nothing on earth and that theory of evolution has more missing links than firm facts.

In another earlier article I was showing that light can arrange itself along the DNA and stays this way after DNA is removed physically from the test area, this concept is called DNA phantom effect. 

It appears that it is the DNA or a wave like structure which molds the matter around us not the other way around. If this was true, what Darwin would have to say?

Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday 10 April 2013

Water crystals can tell everything about you and your environment

  Snowy Manitoba Photo by Bogdan Fiedur
Snowy Manitoba Photo by Bogdan Fiedur
Researcher Masaru Emoto is a head of the I.H.M. General Research Institute, Inc., the President of I.H.M., Inc., and the chief representative of I.H.M.'s HADO Fellowship and in  1992 he received certification as a Doctor of Alternative Medicine from the Indian Board of Alternative Medicine.  He has discovered that human consciousness has an effect on the molecular structure of water. Under microscope he photographed crystals of water. He noticed that crystals were forming much easier from clean spring water than water from  big rivers or tap water. He also experimented and tested how formation of water crystals was influenced by various kinds of music, human moods, prayer, visualization in short human consciousness. Since our physical bodies are two-thirds water and our nervous functions are dependent on appropriate levels of water in our body, it is important that energy we surround ourselves is of highest quality. By this I mean, healthy foods, healthy air and clean water as well as positive energy and supportive and creative environment. We should avoid individuals with negative and hostile nature as their thought energy will interfere with the total level of positive energy we can accumulate and hold. Laughter, concentration of what we are capable of doing as opposed to what we don't like are imperative to our well being and physical and mental health.

Considering the fact that watter is an indispensable ingredient to our lives and now understanding that water can remember, we can reason that water is part of our consciousness code. The implications of this knowledge for our health and the health of our environment are profound.

 Masure Emoto writes on his website.
The result was that we always observed beautiful crystals after giving good words, playing good music, and showing, playing, or offering pure prayer to water. On the other hand, we observed disfigured crystals in the opposite situation. Moreover, we never observed identical crystals.

I believe the original idea of creation by the creator of this universe was “the pursuit of beauty.” Everything is combination of energetic vibration. As vibration resonates, it makes some tangible objects.

Combination of non-resonating vibration can result in destructive energy, and nothing can be created out of it. When some vibration and the other resonate each other, it always creates beautiful design. Thus, most of the Earth is covered with beautiful nature.
That is why scientists, philosophers, and religionists pursue for unknown facts. Is it presumptuous to suggest them taking paths with “the pursuit of beauty” in mind as a means to confirm their right paths?

Therefore, the photograph of crystals is neither science nor religion. I hope it is enjoyed as a new type of art. Nevertheless, the world it shows is truth, and there is no doubt that many messages essential to our lives are hidden in it.
Masaru Emoto 
Below are photographs of water crystals from the book "The Hidden Messages from the water"

Air on a G String, Bach

Photo of Dolphines

Dianshan Lake, China

Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday 5 April 2013

Were Egyptian Pyramids Built by Higher Civilization?

When you keep reading facts about pyramids, (I found this list on David's Wilcock website Divine Cosmos), one has to wonder how was it possible that civilization over 4000 years ago, was able to come up with such a precision in building of massive structures, with perfect arrangements towards other planets, with dimensions correlating with planetary distances and perfect positioning of the structure on the surface of the earth taking into account exact center of the Earth's landmass. I'm not even talking here about how pyramids were built because as we know there are various hypothesis about it. All I want to do is to show certain facts which point that such structure like Great Pyramid couldn't be built even today with all the existing technology to be as precise as this old structure is. If this pyramid couldn't be built easily today, who built it and why?

Robert M Schoch - Forgotten Civilization
Robert M. Schoch, Ph. D. writes

A not-so-final note: I had been to Egypt before, and since the trip I describe here I have traveled to Egypt on many more occasions. The quest i not yet over. After much meticulous study, I have concluded that the beginnings of the Great Pyramid extend back in time much earlier than generally thought, indicating a level of sophistication not usually acknowledged for such remote period. In many ways, tracing the history and meaning of th Great Pyramid is key to understanding our origins as civilized beings. The Great Pyramid is not just a stagnant pile of ancient rock; it is structure that embodies the human spirit, and it has lesson to teach us today.

David Pratt, in an article on the pyramids, stated the following:

"The Pyramid is an unrivaled feat of engineering and craftsmanship. It is aligned with the four cardinal points more accurately than any contemporary structure, including the Meridian Building at Greenwich Observatory in London. The 350-foot-long descending passage is so straight that it deviates from a central axis by less than a quarter of an inch from side to side and only one tenth of an inch up and down -- comparable with the best laser-controlled drilling being done today.
The casing stones, some of which weighed over 16 tons, are so perfectly shaped and squared that the mortar-filled joint between them is just one-fiftieth of an inch -- the thickness of a human nail. Egyptologist Sir Flinders Petrie described such phenomenal precision as "the finest opticians' work;" work of this calibre is beyond the capabilities of modern technology. The casing stones show no tool marks and the corners are not even slightly chipped.
The granite coffer in the King's Chamber is cut out of a solid block of hard red granite -- so precisely that its external volume is exactly twice its internal volume. Engineer and master craftsman Christopher Dunn rejects the theory that it could have been cut and hollowed using bronze saws set with diamond cutting points, because when pressure was applied, the diamonds would have worked their way into the much softer copper, leaving the granite virtually unscathed.
In his opinion, the evidence shows that the Egyptians would have to have possessed ultra-modern tools, including tubular drills that could cut granite 500 times faster than modern drills. But that is not all. The Great Pyramid embodies an advanced knowledge of geometry, geodesy (the science of earth measurement), and astronomy."

Some other facts about pyramids

  • The base of the Great Pyramid x 43200 equals the equatorial circumference of Earth, with better than 1% accuracy
  • The height x 43200 equals the polar radius accurate to 0.2% (Note: Whoever built the pyramids knew that Earth wasn't a perfect sphere, for there were different measures for the equatorial and polar circumferences) 4320 is the number of years for Earth to move thru 2 zodiacal signs, or one sixth of the precession of the equinoxes
  • The three main pyramids at Giza mimic the stars of Orion's Belt in size and arrangement, as they would have appeared in 10,450 BC
  • If the Nile is represented by the Milky Way, then the position of the three Pyramids in relationship to the Nile reflects exactly the position of Orion's belt relative to the Milky Way during the time of solstice in 10,500 BC
  • Each of the Pyramid's four walls, when measured as a straight line, are 9,131 inches long, for a total of 36,524 inches. The exact length of the solar year is 365.24 days
  • The Great Pyramid's perimeter/height ratio is exactly 2 pi. The pi constant in mathematics was not discovered until much later
  • The Pyramid is located at the exact center of the Earth's landmass. Its East-West axis lies exactly on the longest land parallel -- passing through Africa, Asia, and America. The longest land meridian, through Asia, Africa, Europe, and Antarctica, also passes right through the Pyramid
  • The sides of the Pyramid are very slightly and evenly bowed in, or concave. This effect was discovered around 1940 by a pilot taking aerial photos. Today's laser instruments show that all of these perfectly cut and intentionally bowed blocks precisely duplicatethe curvature of the earth.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday 3 April 2013

Is moon an artificial satellite?

King's Park Gates Photo by Bogdan Fiedur
On this page, I have found several strange facts about the moon. Some scientists say that those facts couldn't be occurrence of natural celestial body arrangements and are pointing to possibility of moon as being an artificial body. As with everything in science, those scientist could be wrong, but if they are correct, who do you think would be responsible for positioning the moon where it is?

1. Moon’s Age: The moon is far older than previously expected. Maybe even older than the Earth or the Sun. The oldest age for the Earth is estimated to be 4.6 billion years old; moon rocks were dated at 5.3 billion years old, and the dust upon which they were resting was at least another billion years older.

2. Rock’s Origin: The chemical composition of the dust upon which the rocks sat differed remarkably from the rocks themselves, contrary to accepted theories that the dust resulted from weathering and breakup of the rocks themselves. The rocks had to have come from somewhere else.

3. Heavier Elements on Surface: Normal planetary composition results in heavier elements in the core and lighter materials at the surface; not so with the moon. According to Wilson,

"The abundance of refractory elements like titanium in the surface areas is so pronounced that several geologists proposed the refractory compounds were brought to the moon’s surface in great quantity in some unknown way. They don’t know how, but that it was done cannot be questioned."

4. Water Vapor: On March 7, 1971, lunar instruments placed by the astronauts recorded a vapor cloud of water passing across the surface of the moon. The cloud lasted 14 hours and covered an area of about 100 square miles.

5. Magnetic Rocks: Moon rocks were magnetized. This is odd because there is no magnetic field on the moon itself. This could not have originated from a "close call" with Earth—such an encounter would have ripped the moon apart.

6. No Volcanoes: Some of the moon’s craters originated internally, yet there is no indication that the moon was ever hot enough to produce volcanic eruptions.

7. Moon Mascons: Mascons, which are large, dense, circular masses lying twenty to forty miles beneath the centers of the moon’s maria,

"are broad, disk-shaped objects that could be possibly some kind of artificial construction. For huge circular disks are not likely to be beneath each huge maria, centered like bull’s-eyes in the middle of each, by coincidence or accident."

8. Seismic Activity: Hundreds of "moonquakes" are recorded each year that cannot be attributed to meteor strikes. In November, 1958, Soviet astronomer Nikolay A. Kozyrev of the Crimean Astrophysical Observatory photographed a gaseous eruption of the moon near the crater Alphonsus. He also detected a reddish glow that lasted for about an hour. In 1963, astronomers at the Lowell Observatory also saw reddish glows on the crests of ridges in the Aristarchus region. These observations have proved to be precisely identical and periodical, repeating themselves as the moon moves closer to the Earth. These are probably not natural phenomena.

9. Hollow Moon: The moon’s mean density is 3.34 gm/cm3 (3.34 times an equal volume of water) whereas the Earth’s is 5.5. What does this mean? In 1962, NASA scientist Dr. Gordon MacDonald stated,

"If the astronomical data are reduced, it is found that the data require that the interior of the moon is more like a hollow than a homogeneous sphere."

Nobel chemist Dr. Harold Urey suggested the moon’s reduced density is because of large areas inside the moon where is "simply a cavity."


MIT’s Dr. Sean C. Solomon wrote,

"the Lunar Orbiter experiments vastly improved our knowledge of the moon’s gravitational field... indicating the frightening possibility that the moon might be hollow."

In Carl Sagan’s treatise, Intelligent Life in the Universe, the famous astronomer stated, "A natural satellite cannot be a hollow object."

10. Moon Echoes: On November 20, 1969, the Apollo 12 crew jettisoned the lunar module ascent stage causing it to crash onto the moon. The LM’s impact (about 40 miles from the Apollo 12 landing site) created an artificial moonquake with startling characteristics—the moon reverberated like a bell for more than an hour.


This phenomenon was repeated with Apollo 13 (intentionally commanding the third stage to impact the moon), with even more startling results. Seismic instruments recorded that the reverberations lasted for three hours and twenty minutes and traveled to a depth of twenty-five miles, leading to the conclusion that the moon has an unusually light—or even no—core.

11. Unusual Metals: The moon’s crust is much harder than presumed. Remember the extreme difficulty the astronauts encountered when they tried to drill into the maria? Surprise! The maria is composed primarily illeminite, a mineral containing large amounts of titanium, the same metal used to fabricate the hulls of deep-diving submarines and the skin of the SR-71 "Blackbird". Uranium 236 and neptunium 237 (elements not found in nature on Earth) were discovered in lunar rocks, as were rustproof iron particles.

12. Moon’s Origin: Before the astronauts’ moon rocks conclusively disproved the theory, the moon was believed to have originated when a chunk of Earth broke off eons ago (who knows from where?). Another theory was that the moon was created from leftover "space dust" remaining after the Earth was created. Analysis of the composition of moon rocks disproved this theory also.


Another popular theory is that the moon was somehow "captured" by the Earth’s gravitational attraction. But no evidence exists to support this theory. Isaac Asimov, stated,

"It’s too big to have been captured by the Earth. The chances of such a capture having been effected and the moon then having taken up nearly circular orbit around our Earth are too small to make such an eventuality credible."

13. Weird Orbit: Our moon is the only moon in the solar system that has a stationary, near-perfect circular orbit. Stranger still, the moon’s center of mass is about 6000 feet closer to the Earth than its geometric center (which should cause wobbling), but the moon’s bulge is on the far side of the moon, away from the Earth. "Something" had to put the moon in orbit with its precise altitude, course, and speed.

14. Moon Diameter: How does one explain the "coincidence" that the moon is just the right distance, coupled with just the right diameter, to completely cover the sun during an eclipse? Again, Isaac Asimov responds,

"There is no astronomical reason why the moon and the sun should fit so well. It is the sheerest of coincidences, and only the Earth among all the planets is blessed in this fashion."

15. Spaceship Moon: As outrageous as the Moon-Is-a-Spaceship Theory is, all of the above items are resolved if one assumes that the moon is a gigantic extraterrestrial craft, brought here eons ago by intelligent beings. This is the only theory that is supported by all of the data, and there are no data that contradict this theory.

This video below doesn't discuss moon specifically, but Dr. Michio Kaku, theoretical physicist and co-founder of string field theory, a branch of superstring theory, speaks about 3 types of Extraterrestrial Civilizations. He mention that there are civilizations which can manipulate planets and obtain energy from stars. Could be moon positioned as earth satellite by one of those civilizations?

Enhanced by Zemanta